|
|
 |
|
|
|
Chapter Links
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 1: The Bible as Literature and as History
|
|
Terms to know: devotional approach, deflationary approach, academic
approach, Tanak, Torah, Neviim, Kethuvim, Old
Testament, New Testament, canonization, empirical historical method
|
|
1.
|
Contrast the devotional, deflationary, and academic approaches to the Bible.
What characteristics make each approach distinct from the other two?
|
|
2.
|
Many people think that taking a devotional approach to the Bible necessarily
means reading the Bible literally, but this is not the case. Explain how one might approach
the Bible devotionally without reading the Bible literally.
|
|
3.
|
In what ways can the academic approach to the Bible be valuable to persons
of faith?
|
|
4.
|
What is the difference between synchronic questions and diachronic
questions?
|
|
5.
|
What does it mean to say that canonization was an informal process rather
than a formal process? When did the different parts of the Bible achieve canonical status?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 2: A Brief History of Biblical Interpretation
|
|
Terms to know: targum, midrash,
Mishnah, allegorical interpretation, typological interpretation
|
|
1.
|
Cite some examples of biblical passages that are themselves interpretations
of other biblical passages.
|
|
2.
|
What does it mean to interpret scriptures allegorically? Why, in particular,
did Philo of Alexandria seek allegorical interpretations of the Jewish scriptures?
|
|
3.
|
What does it mean to interpret scriptures typologically? Why, in particular,
did the Fathers of the Church seek typological interpretations of the Jewish scriptures?
|
|
4.
|
How were medieval interpretations of the Bible motivated by medieval
thinkers’ belief in the unity of truth?
|
|
5.
|
Explain the contribution of Johann Semler to the history of biblical
interpretation. How might the distinction that he introduced help one to answer questions 2
and 3 under Chapter 1 (above)?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 3: Prehistory: Creation and Ancestral Legends
|
|
Terms to know: Documentary Hypothesis, Elohim, theophany, myth, legend, etiology, anachronism
|
|
1.
|
Explain the differences between the first and second creation stories in
Genesis. To which sources do scholars attribute these stories, and why?
|
|
2.
|
What does the first creation story mean when it says that God created
humankind “in his image”? What is significant about the fact that Genesis 1:27 refers to the
image of God twice and then uses the phrase “male and female” in the very same sentence?
|
|
3.
|
Can what the Bible says about creation be reconciled with what science tells
us about the history of the universe and the solar system, the evolution of life on earth,
and so on? Could one regard both the Bible and science as asserting something true? If so,
how?
|
|
4.
|
What do scholars mean when they assert that the stories of Israel’s
ancestors are legends? What evidence suggests that those stories might date to pre-Israelite
times?
|
|
5.
|
What are we to make of the story of Jacob? Why do you think God chose to
favor him, given the rather unflattering portrait we are given of him as a young man? What
do you think the authors of this story may have hoped to achieve by constructing it as they
did?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 4: The Exodus Tradition
|
|
Terms to know: YHWH, Merneptah
Stele, Hyksos, covenant, vassal treaty, Decalogue, lex
talionis
|
|
1.
|
Read Exodus 4:24-26. Who, exactly, did the Lord try to kill—Moses or Moses’
son Gershom? If it was Moses, why would the Lord try to kill the very man whom the Lord has
just chosen to lead the Hebrews out of Egypt? If it was Gershom, why would the Lord want to
kill the (presumably innocent) child of a Hebrew? What purpose might the authors of the
exodus tradition have had in including this rather bizarre story?
|
|
2.
|
What do you think the name YHWH
means? Why would the Lord pick such an unusual name?
|
|
3.
|
What is the Merneptah Stele? What date does it suggest for the exodus, and
how does it do so?
|
|
4.
|
Explain the basic parts of a vassal treaty, and give examples of how the
Sinai Covenant can be said to contain elements corresponding to those parts.
|
|
5.
|
Is the lex talionis just? Can the
Decalogue’s prohibition of murder be reconciled with the command to put murderers to death?
How might such laws have prevented the emergence of blood feuds?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 5: Conquest and Monarchy
|
|
Terms to know: Deuteronomic History, Conquest Hypothesis, Peaceful
Infiltration Hypothesis, Social Revolution Hypothesis, Davidic Covenant, United Kingdom,
Divided Kingdom
|
|
1.
|
In what sense may the books of Joshua and Judges be said to paint different
pictures of Israel’s occupation of Canaan? Explain the three leading historical hypotheses
regarding the occupation; which book supports which hypothesis, and why?
|
|
2.
|
The Lord of the Deuteronomic History commands the Israelites to kill every
man, woman, and child in the Canaanite cities they attack (see Deut 20:16-18; Josh 6:21,
8:1-2; 1 Sam 15:3). This command was a herem (ban)
on all things and persons which were part of a foreign god’s qadesh (holiness); because that which was holy to one
god (such as Baal) could not be considered holy to another god (such as YHWH), it had to be
destroyed for the sake of purity. (Evidence suggests that such bans were not strictly
applied.) Is such a herem consistent with the Decalogue’s prohibition of murder? If the ban
was not strictly applied, why did the Deuteronomist emphasize the idea?
|
|
3.
|
How do the stories about Saul suggest that the Deuteronomic Historian may
have blended two distinct accounts of the founding of the Israelite monarch?
|
|
4.
|
In what way are the Deuteronomic History’s accounts of the northern and
southern kings formulaic? How are the formulas for northern and southern kings similar, and
how are they different? Why do scholars suspect that this account may be a compilation of
works produced in two different periods?
|
|
5.
|
A problematic tension exists between the Davidic Covenant (2 Sam 7:1-16) and
the subsequent events that the Deuteronomic History recounts—namely, the division of Israel
into two kingdoms and the ultimate collapse of both of those kingdoms. What is this tension?
From the academic perspective, is there anything about the Deuteronomic History to suggests
that the writing and editing of that history was influenced by the authors’ reflections on
this tension?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 6: The Prophets
|
|
Terms to know: Former Prophets, Latter Prophets, Major Prophets, Minor
Prophets, covenant lawsuit, eschatological, day of the Lord, theodicy, Babylonian Exile
|
|
1.
|
Distinguish the Former Prophets from the Latter Prophets. What are the basic
themes that run throughout the Latter Prophets?
|
|
2.
|
Read 2 Kings 2:23-25. How does this story make you feel about the prophet
Elisha? About prophets in general? Why do you think the Deuteronomic Historian included it?
|
|
3.
|
What is the difference between practical polytheism, practical monotheism,
theoretical polytheism, and theoretical monotheism? Why did the prophet known as Second
Isaiah feel the need to emphasize theoretical monotheism?
|
|
4.
|
From the academic standpoint, what connections can be drawn between the fall
of Jerusalem and the Babylonian Exile, on the one hand, and the emerging stress on personal
morality and individual responsibility in such prophets as Jeremiah and Ezekiel, on the
other?
|
|
5.
|
Supposing, as many scholars do, that the book of Jonah is not an account of
historical events but rather an allegory or a moral tale, what meaning do you think the
author hoped to convey to his or her fellow Jews? What, especially, is the significance of
(a) Jonah’s failed efforts to avoid his task (1:3-2:10); (b) his response to the
Lord’s decision regarding Nineveh (4:1-5); and (c) the Lord’s comment about the bush
(4:6-11)?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 7: Songs and Wisdom Literature
|
|
Terms to know: Tehillim, lament,
hymn, enthronement psalm,
liturgical psalm, wisdom psalm, acrostic, wasf,
Qoheleth
|
|
1.
|
Consider the various attitudes taken toward the Lord in the different types
of psalms. What does the existence of these various attitudes and their celebration in song
tell us about the Yahwist faith?
|
|
2.
|
Why was there a long period of disagreement about whether the Song of Songs
should be included in the Hebrew canon? What considerations finally led to its canonization?
|
|
3.
|
Contrast the books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes. In what important ways are
they similar? In what significant ways do they differ?
|
|
4.
|
Are the Qoheleth’s cynical views
compatible with the Jewish faith in YHWH? If so, how? If not, why do you think Ecclesiastes
was admitted to the Hebrew canon?
|
|
5.
|
Read Job 42:7. What, exactly, have Job’s friends done to evoke God’s anger?
Why do some interpreters see this verse as evidence of a dark message in the book of Job,
namely, that we human beings are not as important or as valuable as we typically think we
are?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 8: Postexilic Writings
|
|
Terms to know: Restoration, Zoroastrianism, Chronicler’s History,
festival scroll, Purim, Ptolemies, Seleucids, apocalyptic literature
|
|
1.
|
In what significant ways did the experience of the Babylonian Exile change
the way that Jews understood their own faith? What evidence of such changes do we find in
the Chronicler’s History?
|
|
2.
|
Is Nehemiah justified in telling his neighboring vassal kings that they have
“no claim or historic right in Jerusalem” (Neh 2:20)? Why or why not? What are the
implications of your answer for contemporary debates about the fate of Jerusalem?
|
|
3.
|
Why do you think that intermarriage was regarded as such a serious problem
during the Restoration? On which side of the debate about intermarriage do you think the
author of the book of Ruth comes down, and why?
|
|
4.
|
Why do most scholars regard the book of Esther as a fictional short story
rather than an historical narrative? Why do some scholars suspect that its origin may lie in
a Babylonian custom?
|
|
5.
|
What do scholars take to be the purpose of apocalyptic literature? Explain
how the apocalyptic visions of Daniel 11 can be interpreted as referring to historical
events of the Hellenistic period
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 9: Late Second Temple Judaism
|
|
Terms to know: Apocrypha, Hasmonaean Dynasty, Hanukkah, Jewish War, sect,
Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Zealots, Sicarii, Dead Sea Scrolls, Septuagint
|
|
1.
|
What was the Hasmonaean Dynasty? How did it come to be? What brought it to
an end?
|
|
2.
|
Explain the distinctive characteristics of the Sadducees, the Pharisees, the
Essenes, the Zealots, and the Sicarii.
|
|
3.
|
Why does Lawrence Schiffman believe that the Qumran community was founded by
Sadducees? Why do most other scholars believe that the Qumranites were actually Essenes?
|
|
4.
|
Having surveyed both the tumultuous events of the second temple period and
the Jewish sects that emerged in that period, why do you think that the Pharisaic sect was
the only one to have a lasting legacy? What was it about their approach to the Jewish faith
that made the Pharisees better suited for survival than the other Jewish sects?
|
|
5.
|
What is the Septuagint? How does it relate to the differences in content
that exist between the Hebrew Tanak and the Christian Old Testament?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 10: Jesus of Nazareth
|
|
Terms to know: Jesus of history, Christ of faith, Christ Event,
authenticating criteria,
kingdom of God, messiah, Son of God, Son of Man
|
|
1.
|
What do scholars mean when they distinguish the Jesus of history from the
Christ of faith? What is the value in trying to understand the former independently of the
latter?
|
|
2.
|
What can be asserted about the life of the historical Jesus based solely on
extrabiblical sources?
|
|
3.
|
Why do scholars searching for information about the historical Jesus feel
the need to apply authenticating criteria to biblical passages about Jesus? How does each
different criterion indicate whether a given passage about Jesus is more or less likely to
be historically accurate?
|
|
4.
|
Considering what we have learned about the second temple period, why do you
think that it was in this period that the concepts of messiah and Son of
Man took on eschatological features? What sort of things were going on in the
second temple period that would have made such features appealing?
|
|
5.
|
Given our understanding of Jewish sectarianism in the second temple period,
why might the application to Jesus of titles like messiah or Son of
Man by his disciples have brought Jesus into conflict with the Sanhedrin? Why
might it have brought him into conflict with the Roman prefect?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 11: The Gospels
|
|
Terms to know: gospel, synoptic problem, Four Source Hypothesis,
messianic secret, Christology, logos
|
|
1.
|
What is the synoptic problem, and how does the Four Source Hypothesis
attempt to solve that problem? What are the four sources it posits, and why does it posit
each one?
|
|
2.
|
Why does Mark’s Jesus wish to conceal his identity? Consider this question
in two ways. First, suppose that the messianic secret traces to the historical Jesus. Why do
you think he would have wished to keep his identity a secret? What purposes would such an
effort serve? Second, suppose that the messianic secret is a stylistic interpretation of the
meaning of Jesus’ ministry on the part of the author of the Gospel of Mark. What ideas might
that author have hoped to convey through such a stylistic device?
|
|
3.
|
Read Matthew’s parables of the kingdom (13:36-52). In what sense might these
passages be regarded as eschatological? How were such parables meant to help people
understand the kingdom of God?
|
|
4.
|
Explain the philosophical and theological background of the Greek term
logos. How is this term used to establish the identity of Jesus in the prologue to the
Gospel of John (John 1:1-18)? What sort of Christology does this usage represent, and why?
|
|
5.
|
As we have seen, John’s Christology portrays Jesus as having been fully
aware of his nature and destiny. This portrayal would later lead to serious concerns among
Christian theologians. Suppose that, as Christians believe, Jesus was the messiah whose
death and resurrection made eternal life possible for all people. On this supposition, why
does it matter how much Jesus understood about his own nature and destiny? Why might John’s
characterization of Jesus as a consciously divine being cause problems for Christian
theologians?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 12: Acts of the Apostles
|
|
Terms to know: Luke-Acts, kerygmatic speech, apologetic speech, apostle,
the Twelve, Hellenists, Hebrews, Jerusalem Conference
|
|
1.
|
Explain why biblical scholars are convinced that the same author wrote both
the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles.
|
|
2.
|
Read the speech of Stephen at 7:2-53. Is this speech kerygmatic, apologetic,
or both? Give reasons in support of your answer.
|
|
3.
|
Read Paul’s speech to the Athenians at 17:16-34. Is this speech kerygmatic,
apologetic, or both? Give reasons in support of your answer.
|
|
4.
|
What differentiated the two groups that the book of Acts refers to as
Hebrews and Hellenists? How does Acts link the differences between these groups to the first
persecution of Christians?
|
|
5.
|
What events and issues brought about the Jerusalem Conference? How were the
decisions that were made at that conference crucial to the future of Christianity?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 13: The Pauline Epistles
|
|
Terms to know: authenticity, apostolic authority, parousia, Judaizers,
justification through faith, Jewish Question, Gnosticism, Koiné
|
|
1.
|
Explain the difference between authorship and authority. In what sense might
a letter be authentically Pauline in terms of apostolic authority even if it is not
authentically Pauline in terms of authorship?
|
|
2.
|
Explain why scholars believe that 1 and 2 Corinthians are actually as many
as five distinct letters (or partial letters) that were later combined by an editor into
their present form. What prompted the various letters, and what did each letter address?
|
|
3.
|
Consider the issues that arise in trying to date the epistle to the
Galatians. Do you think that the events described at Gal 2:11-14 are likely to have happened
after the Jerusalem Conference? Why or why not?
|
|
4.
|
What concern among first-century Jewish Christians do scholars refer to as
the Jewish Question? What answer to this question does Paul give in his letter to the
Romans?
|
|
5.
|
Explain why some scholars doubt that the letters to the Colossians and the
Ephesians were actually written by Paul.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Chapter 14: Epistles and Revelation
|
|
Terms to know: Platonic forms, Melchizedek, catholic,
Docetism, imperial cult, menorah, Har Megiddo
|
|
1.
|
How does the letter to the Hebrews attempt to establish the superiority of
Christianity to Judaism? For whom was this letter probably intended, and why?
|
|
2.
|
Why do many scholars doubt that the letters of James and Jude were actually
written by brothers of Jesus?
|
|
3.
|
From the academic standpoint, why do you think that the author of the
Johannine Epistles regarded Docetism as such a threat to Christian orthodoxy? In other
words, given our understanding of the theology of the early Christian church, why would the
Docetists’ denial of the doctrine of the incarnation have been so unbearable?
|
|
4.
|
What was the Roman emperor cult? Explain how the symbols used in the book of
Revelation support the view that Revelation was written at a time when Christians were being
persecuted for their failure to participate in this practice.
|
|
5.
|
The Book of Revelation assured Christians that the defeat of their enemies
and the end of their sufferings were coming soon (1:1, 3; 22:10). But the cataclysmic fall
of “Babylon” (= Rome) and the establishment of a new world order promised by the book of
Revelation did not, in fact, come soon; Rome would continue to rule the Mediterranean world
for centuries. Given this fact, answer the following question from the academic perspective:
Why did the book of Revelation eventually achieve canonical status?
|
|
|
|
|